Ls50 vs ls50w reddit. I do not have any other option than to choose this.
Ls50 vs ls50w reddit. For reference, they are on my desk sitting about 5" away from the wall on auralex speaker pads, 2. Now they are wired. Other than that I read it gets AirPlay 2 and has slightly more amplifier power, don’t think the LS50W really needed more power, and Roon something something? Regarding the LSX vs LSX-II? Dec 27, 2019 · LS50 - ok more clear LS50W good more bass Tower: Uni-Q 6. Pretty impressive considering the much lower price of the LS50W over the Devialet and Pass Labs. Both sounded great but on my small desk but the LSX II actually sounded a little better. And I’m torn. : I've used both LSX and LS50W as desktop speakers (both with REL sub) and i would never go back to the LSX, it's a serious downgrade. Just wondering if you’ve had the chance to hear the Meta’s or Wirekess ii yet. But but but Dec 7, 2020 · Hi - before any decision, I would double check whether the LS50w II has a digital input on par with the USB input of the first version, which is (was) by far the best connection for that speaker. ---LSX II vs LS50W II---This is just in direct regard to my near-field listening experience. Hi there. Hi, I was wondering if anyone has tried comparing a ls50 wireless ii vs a ls50 meta + Cambridge audio evo 75 pairing? They'd cost roughly about the same for me (wireless ii would be new, can't really find 2nd hand ones around here, while I saw a meta 2nd hand available + an evo 75 new). Or perhaps just bought the wireless ls50 meta. Moving to a Devialet 120 using SAM (Speaker Active Matching) on passive LS50's was an improvement over the Pass Labs combo and the bass was deeper than the actives but overall LS50W's came ahead. I have heard them too, they sound quite different from the LS50s. There definitely is. I haven't gone through many of the comments, but I had the exact experience. Check out the Triangle Borea series. I plan to write a review and comparison with the Naim Mu-So 2 (my current system) later on but wanted to share my initial experience setting up the LS50W today. Designed to give you max performance, go 4 the Wireless you won’t regret. Bass impact is surprisingly similar between the two, though the LS50W obviously digs I saw a youtube video proclaiming the LS50w as superior to the LS50 since most people under-power the passive version which requires a lot of clean power to open them up. You have for sure a good sounding system! After ARC, I enjoy(ed) the ls50 meta, but love the R3's. I expected the LSX to sound thinner than the LS50W, but they're actually slightly warmer. I paid $1950 for my LS50W's and stopped there. The BR02 and BR03 sounded fantastic and better than the LS50 to my ears. I have raised this with KEF and sent a to do list that would confuse the most experienced network specialist. In short, setting up the LS50W on a WiFi network was an utterly miserable experience due to the KEF apps. I do not have any other option than to choose this. The wireless sounds easy, just plug it in and go. 1. They just had more room to breath and open up where the LS50W II did not. 5 feet from each other, and 2. Even at that point, the LS50w will still have better low-end extension. If I use the integrated as a preamp, for room correction only, there will be an extra digital -> analog -> digital step. Sweeter, fuller and more natural on vocals and live instruments. Don't get me wrong, I could tell the LS50W II had better detail in the mid-range. Anyone with LS50's will have paid a similar price with amp and DAC included. My budget currently allows either LS50W II or LS50 Meta with an AVR. Im using the LS50 for desktop use and if it wasn't for the price I got them for I would've pounced for the BR02 no question. If it doesn’t, I would take advantage of the price reduction on the first generation and invest in a high quality USB cable. The benefits vs the LS50 Meta are 1) room correction, 2) active crossovers and 3) bass extension. Feb 16, 2019 · For a fair comparison, LS50W were also connected to the Matrix X-Sabre Pro DAC, so both used the same source, amplification was the decisive factor between the two models. But I understand the concerns about lock-in, risk of Wi-Fi dropouts, long term support for an all in one system, and I’d be committing to 2. So LS50W + Sonos Port would be preferential to R3's + Sonos Amp? Yes A minor gripe is that I'd still need to actually turn on the LS50's though, there is no 12v trigger, sadly. I reviewed the LS50W as a stand-alone system, which it why it won on price but lost so horribly on the rest of the general usability criteria. Omg. Ron claims speaker is almost the same as old LS50, just very small voicing differences that he personally prefers and you may not. They're the same. In the mean time, those replacement drivers were 250 the pair a few years back. . Nov 15, 2021 · The LS50 Wireless ii has an analog input. S. With ls50w high pass filter on forget about it. 5-3 feet from me. The LS50W Meta is a plainly better speaker than the original. Says it definitely needs a sub. Wamer I'd say. The LS50W idle at ~15w, at $. 5 better Uni-Q 8" best Polk S60 great for some music, not so great for others, KEF sounds more 'real' polk more bassy but not always in a good way Then I listened to the LS50 (non wireless) and Kube10b it was OK but the sub was overpowering, I'm sure they had the settings off. LS50 metas are much more aesthetically pleasing though, imo. As volume increases, R3's are noticeably more musical. The sales guy said they are head and shoulders above R3's and entry level amp because of DSP etc Systems demo'd: R3 Meta with high end Hegel - bench mark R3 Meta with Cambridge Evo 75 = Not as rich as Hegel LS50W - lots of detail, amazing sound stage and instrument separation. I figured I would write a short (maybe?) post on what my initial impressions are of the LS50W versus the Adam A7X studio monitor. Placed further apart, the LS50Ws advantages start to show, but since I've seen many setups posted with the LS50W just a few feet apart. So to say that the passive LS50's hold more value is kinda ridiculous to me. At low to low-medium volume, not much difference between R3's and LS50 metas. ls50w does not at up to 6-70% can't go higher as I don't want to get kicked out of my building :p Music. I’m considering the latter vs the Buchardt A500. I also ran across another point of another forum: " Since the low frequencies pose the biggest demand on both speakers and power amplifier, you make life rather easier for them if you divert that task to a dedicated low Apr 30, 2021 · The LS50W-II is based on the LS50 Meta (Passive - 12th gen Uni-Q driver). The LS50W sounded more dynamic and livelier, even more explosive on some tracks, while the LS50 sounded slower and calmer with weaker dynamic rises. Dealer of KEF and Marantz is a friend and I can get good discount. That's why USB on the old LS50W was so nice, all you needed was a plain old USB cable and you could use them to their full potential as desktop speakers. It's technically more linear in a way that's a bit more exaggerated than the passives - thanks in part to having onboard DSP, but it's also more powerful overall, and the delta on the App Kef's made for it alone is reason enough to only look at the new Meta version. Says competition has gotten a lot stiffer since original LS50 release and implies that $1500 is too much, considering the limited bass output. The LS50W doesn’t technically require an external streamer to operate, but it’ll make your experience much better due to KEF’s terrible apps. I just received my KEF LS50W today and the speakers sound phenomenal. Narrowed it down to either LS50 wireless ii or LS50 meta. I've seen some reviews where people prefer the $720 Sierra 1 to the LS50. LSX begins vibrating the enclosure at 2/3's volume. The LS50W II are very unstable with the wifi connection even with the other speaker. So I assume that is where the subtle sound quality improvements are. I also like the Elacs. Powering the LS50's with a $300 integrated? Really doubt that's going to compete with the LS50W's. I think the LSX would fare better. Bought an open box pair of LS50w as I heard these were considered an "end-game" solution on reddit and by online reviewers. darko. P. audio has a good review with the first gen LS50 Wireless and the Elacs. I was stepping up from a Cambridge integrated and Elac B6s (good, but not amazing gear). This is interesting. In short, I think the original non-wireless LS50 can be a better sounding speaker, but to get that performance will cost a lot more than a LS50w, at least in the form I have. I own the LS50's only because they look good, they sound alright but not amazing. The Audiovector and Monitor Audio are expansive speakers and absolutely shine but, the LS50 is just as good inte detail and clarity at those must more expensive speakers. The LS50W II really looks like a great product at its price point though. Essentially, LS50W's are just LS50's with the amp and DAC built in. 15/kwh it'll cost you ~$20 a year to just leave them on all of the time. Now, I'm just going by a few reviews I've ready, but they all seemed to agree that for the same cost of the LS50W, you couldn't put together the LS50, plus an amp that costs the balance, and have it equal the LS50W in sound quality. This option gives more flexibility but limits me to choose only Marantz power-amp. For example, the $1450 Ascend Acoustics Sierra 2 is arguably better for vocals than the LS50 thanks to the Raal tweeter, and better overall because of the better driver performance. 😂 Kidding there. I loved how easy the LS50Ws are to use and setup. The best amp for the LS50 meta is the LS50 Wireless II … ;) Wireless II is the same speaker but with a KEF in-house build amplifier / DAC / streamer build in. And let's not underestimate the influence of the LS50 being the flavor of the year at reddit. I own a a pair of the LS50W and the LS50W II The LS50W went back to the shop for repairs three times as some blew in side them. I am wondering whether the new LS50 versions come across as bright or shouty at higher volumes given their extreme clarity and transparency. Ls50w without high-pass filter have better highs than lsx with high-pass filter at almost any setting. Or buy the LS50 Meta with any of the above AVR and later add MM7025 power AMP. The LS50 is extremely good value and I'm certain the SVS Ultras is as well Also I use my LS50 with Dirac Live which enhance the detail and clarity extremely well. Adding to the discussion my 2c vs regular LS50 as I’ve owned the LS50w. There should be a way to make them understand and respect that space.